Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Brico Devices for Corporate Social Responsibility- myassignmenthelp
Question: Discuss about theBrico Devices for Corporate Social Responsibility. Answer: Introduction The purpose of this report is to evaluate the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at Brico Devices and to make recommendations for improvements. The report was commissioned by the CEO Mr Mathew Flanagan after a negative coverage in the press and media about the Brico Devices. This report will look at; Remuneration Working conditions Waste disposal methods Environmental unsustainable practice The information was gathered from face-to-face interviews, a questionnaire sent to the managers and supervisors and a site inspection carried out plus a scrutiny on the internal company documents. Findings Remuneration A CSR audit showed that; Brico Devices have been paying below the minimum pay rate as required by the government. A comparison of the salary to the basic rate fixed by the government showed a low pay rate which in turn affects the productivity and the CSR. No Superannuation A CSR audit revealed that there was no superannuation at Brico Devices and employees retired at the age of 60. Working Conditions After an investigation at Brico Devices, it became clear that; A chain of command was not implemented within the company which was the major cause of the poor working conditions. The poor working condition has affected the corporate social responsibility since the working environment is not conducive making the team members stressed. Records showed that the employees worked more than 60 hours per week and one day off per week was not adhered to in some facilities within Brico Devices. Waste disposal methods It was discovered that; The waste disposal practices were unsafe and directly and indirectly damaged the environment causing incurable infections. Both the employees and the environment were affected by the unsafe waste disposal at Brico Devices. Environmentally unsustainable practice After the investigation it became clear that; there was an increasing use of the limited resources in the manufacturing process at the company Conclusion In light of the above findings, it is evident that Brico Devices has violated the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The employees working conditions are below the required standards as determined by the Australia government. According to the Australian economic indicators February 2012, working conditions are regulated by the federal legislations, the awards, the workplace agreement, and the contracts which are unresented at Brico Devices. If the pay rate is not looked at the company risk losing its employees lowering their productivity and may face a government sanction. An increase in the pay rate will increase retention level hence increasing productivity at Brico Devices. Recommendations The company need to implement a workplace management for its employees- according to Cotton and Hart, staff wellbeing is determined by the risk management framework used in a company. The level of hierarchy in the company will foresee the working conditions of all employees (Hardy and Howe2010). Payment rate increased to the basic rate as required by the government- the Australian government minimum wage stand at AU$15.96 per hour which sum to AU$606.40 per week (Charlesworth and Heron 2012). Safe waste disposal measures and proper discharge of toxic gases- from the Australian research council, environmental harm is a crime and mismanagement makes the waste cycle hazardous (Vander Beken and Balcean 2006). References Banerjee, S.B., 2008. Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical sociology, 34(1), pp.51-79 Charlesworth, S. and Heron, A., 2012. New Australian working time minimum standards: Reproducing the same old gendered architecture?. Journal of Industrial relations, 54(2), pp.164-181. Cooper, R., 2010. The new industrial relations and international economic crisis: Australia in 2009. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(3), pp.261-274. Costa, I., Massard, G. and Agarwal, A., 2010. Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), pp.815-822. Golob, U. and Bartlett, J.L., 2007. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), pp.1-9. Hardy, T. and Howe, J., 2010. Partners in enforcement? The new balance between government and trade union enforcement of employment standards in Australia. Ray, R., Sanes, M. and Schmitt, J., 2013. No-vacation nation revisited. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Vander Beken, T. and Balcaen, A., 2006. Crime opportunities provided by legislation in market sectors: mobile phones, waste disposal, banking, pharmaceuticals. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3-4), pp.299-323.